L'AFRIQUE ET L'EXIGENCE DE LA RESPECT DE LA DÉMOCRATIE ~ (Olubor Uyi maitre.)

L'AFRIQUE ET L'EXIGENCE DE LA RESPECT DE LA DÉMOCRATIE ~ (Olubor Uyi maitre.)

ll y a trois jours la Communauté Economique des États de l'Afrique de l'Ouest (CEDAO) a suspendu la  république de guinée de son organisation apres le président démocratique a été renversé.
 Cet décision attire beaucoup de conversation autour de la légalité de suspendre un membre de CEDAO. Avant, quand la CEDAO prenait des decisions comme ça, les gens le critiquaient de se  mettre à l'affaire des pays souverain. 
Toutefois, selon les loi internationaux quand un pays a signé un traité, il est obligé de le respecter. Les pays CEDAO en 2001 se sont accordé sur la Protocole sur la Democratie et la Bonne Gouvernance. Article 1b de cette loi prévu que toute accession au pouvoir doit se faire à travers des élections libres et transparentes. Article 1c interdit tout changement anti-constitutionnel. Et finalement article 1e prévu que l'armée est apolitique et se soumise à l' autorité politique régulièrement établie.
Les pays en s'accordant à cette protocole, accepte toute les articles qui interditent la participation de l'armée dans la direction de leur pays.
Donc, la CEDAO a bien fait quand il a suivi article 45(2) qui le donne le pouvoir de suspendre un etat  membre en cas de rupture de sa démocratie.
C'est attendu que la CEDAO doit rester fort et continue de suivre ses protocole dans sa lutte contre la rupture de la démocratie dans son région. Sinon, on va voir l'armée continue de renverser les gouvernement democratique et prendre le pouvoir. 
C'est bonne que la CEDAO a pris cette decision de suspendre la Répulique de Guinée. Néanmoins, on attend que l'union Africaine effectue article 30 de l'Acte Constitutif de l'Union Africaine. Qui le donne le pouvoir de suspendre les gouvernements qui accédent au pouvoir par des moyens anti-constitutionels. 
Finalement, on dit bravo à la CEDAO parce qu'ils ont montré au putchiste qu'ils ne vont pas être accueilli au seins de leur organisations.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Analysing CAS decision on the prortionality of the FIFA Football Agents Regulation

Analysing CAS decision on the prortionality of the FIFA Football Agents Regulation~E.U Olubor Esq. The subject of this dispute bother on the fundamental question, whether FIFA can extend its regulatory powers beyond the task of governing the sport of football itself and cover peripheral economic activities, particularly the market of football agent service which it did with the establishment of the FFAR The Panel in reviewing Article 15(2) of the FFAR which imposes a service fee cap on service charges to be paid to football agents. The panel in assessing its compatibility with article 101TFEU. The panel concurs with the position of PROFAA that FIFA is an association of undertakings which holds a dominant market position within the definition of article 101& 102 of the TFEU respectively and also relying on the decision in Piau where the EU General Court specifically confirmed that FIFA holds a “collective dominant” position under Article 102 TFEU in the relevant market of football a
Read more

UNDERSTANDING THE DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE (ECJ) ON THE PROPOSED EUROPEAN SUPER LEAGUE

UNDERSTANDING THE DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE (ECJ) ON THE PROPOSED EUROPEAN SUPER LEAGUE~ Emmanuel Uyi Olubor Esq.  The ECJ ruled on the issue of whether UEFA or FIFA rules restricting teams from constituting a separate league are anticompetitive and a breach of a dominant position.  Before I descend into the nitty-gritty of the decision of the ECJ, I would like to commence by establishing certain facts First, the decision is not binding in Britain as a result of BREXIT, thus British teams like Arsenal, Chelsea et al. Can't use this decision reached by the ECJ as a pretext to join the European Super League. Secondly, as against what was reported by most media outlets, the ECJ did not authorize the establishment of a European Soccer league, instead what played out was that the ECJ ruled on points of law on an issue that was sent to it by the commercial court in Spain which was hitherto instituted by the European Super League Company. The ECJ decided on whether UEFA an
Read more

GUNNARSDÓTTIR v OLYMPIC LYONNAIS: An AFFIRMATION BY FIFA ON THE MATERNITY RIGHTS OF FEMALE FOOTBALLERS

GUNNARSDÓTTIR v OLYMPIC LYONNAIS: An AFFIRMATION BY FIFA ON THE MATERNITY RIGHTS OF FEMALE FOOTBALLERS.~Uyi Olubor Esq. The new edition of the FIFA Regulation on Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP)came with numerous innovations. One of those innovations is the enthronement of Maternity rights for Female Footballers. To the extent that, football clubs are forbidden from making the validity of a player's contract subject to a player being or becoming pregnant during its term. These new provisions were recently tested in the dispute between Sarah Bjork Gunnarsdóttir v Olympique Lyonnais at the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chambers (DRC). The dispute arose after a Player who just became pregnant agreed with her club, to leave her base in France and return to her home country in Iceland for the duration of her pregnancy. The club immediately, filed for the social security allowance on behalf of the player amounting to EUR 45.99 per day. The player then inquired as to the reasons why her sa
Read more